Jogging vs. Running for Weight Loss: Which Is Better for Shedding Pounds?

When it comes to burning calories and shedding those extra pounds, both jogging and running are excellent forms of exercise. However, understanding the nuances between the two can help you make an informed decision about which is better suited for weight loss. In this blog post, we’ll explore the benefits of jogging and running, compare their effectiveness for weight loss, and ultimately determine which option is superior.

Comparing Jogging and Running for Weight Loss:

  1. Caloric Expenditure: Both jogging and running are high-intensity cardiovascular exercises that effectively burn calories. The number of calories burned primarily depends on the duration and intensity of your workout. According to a study conducted by Harvard Medical School, a 155-pound person can burn approximately 298 calories in 30 minutes of jogging and 372 calories in the same duration of running.
  2. Intensity and Impact: Running is generally more intense than jogging, involving a faster pace and higher impact on your joints. The higher intensity of running can lead to greater calorie burn and increased cardiovascular benefits. However, if you are new to exercise or have joint concerns, jogging may be a more sustainable and accessible option, allowing you to gradually build your fitness level.
  3. Appetite Suppression: Engaging in either jogging or running can have positive effects on appetite control. Exercise influences appetite-regulating hormones, such as ghrelin and peptide YY, which can help reduce food cravings and improve weight management, as suggested by a study published in the Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism.
  4. Psychological Benefits: Both jogging and running have been linked to improved mood, reduced stress levels, and enhanced mental well-being. Physical activity, including running, releases endorphins, which act as natural mood elevators and help combat symptoms of depression and anxiety. Research published in Psychopharmacology suggests that exercise can also reduce cigarette cravings, which may be
  5. beneficial for individuals trying to quit smoking.
  6. Long-Term Sustainability: When considering weight loss as a long-term goal, sustainability plays a crucial role. Jogging tends to be more sustainable for many individuals due to its lower intensity and reduced impact on the body. It can be easily incorporated into daily routines and maintained over an extended period. On the other hand, running may pose a higher risk of overuse injuries, especially for beginners or individuals with joint issues.
  7. Conclusion: Both jogging and running offer numerous benefits for weight loss. However, considering factors such as individual fitness levels, joint health, and long-term sustainability, jogging tends to be a more suitable choice for most people. Jogging provides an effective calorie-burning workout, improves cardiovascular health, and is accessible to a wider range of individuals. Remember, consistency and enjoyment are key to achieving weight loss goals, so choose the exercise that aligns with your preferences and physical capabilities.

References:

  1. Harvard Health Publishing. “Calories burned in 30 minutes for people of three different weights.” Harvard Medical School. Accessed June 23, 2023. Link
  2. Mayo Clinic Staff. “Running for weight loss: A beginner’s guide.” Mayo Clinic. Accessed June 23, 2023. Link
  3. Stensel, David. “Exercise, appetite and appetite-regulating hormones: implications for food intake and weight control.” Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 57, no. Suppl. 2 (2010): 36-42. Link
  4. Eather, Narelle, et al. “The acute effects of exercise on cigarette cravings, withdrawal symptoms, affect, and smoking behavior: systematic review update and meta-analysis.” Psychopharmacology 241, no. 3 (2018): 467-498. Link
  5. Thompson, W. R. “Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2022.” ACSM’s Health & Fitness Journal 26, no. 6 (2022): 10-19. Link

Disclaimer: 

Nothing contained on this website, regardless of date, should be used as a substitute for direct medical advice from a physician or other qualifies clinician.